Boats
Real Performance
|
Lead Line
— January 2001 By Richard Thiel Real Performance |
||||||||||
| Even sophisticated engines stop running. | ||||||||||
I’ll always remember
the day my high school physics teacher explained to me that the engine
in my 1964 Pontiac GTO was just a mechanism for processing solar energy
that had been stored underground for a few millennia, then extracted in
a gooey guise and refined into what went into my car’s 389-cubic-inch,
triple-carburetor V-8, where it was converted to smog and tire smoke.
My idea of performance has never been the same since. Despite
this early demystification, performance remained an important concern
of mine, and its importance grew when I became interested in powerboats.
In my previous life as a sailor, the subject had been defined externally:
Despite the nuances of hull design, it was wind that made one boat faster
than another. When there was none, all were equal. With powerboats performance
is defined by what’s in the engine compartment. Just
as performance defines powerboats, engines define performance, which explains
why powerboaters are so passionate about their engines. Walk down any
dock, and you’ll hear at least two owners bragging, complaining,
or commiserating about engines. Indeed, powerboaters are about as loyal—if
not more so—to an engine brand as they are to a boat brand. (A boatbuilder
once complained to me that when the boat performed well, the credit went
to the engines; when it didn’t, it was always blamed on the boat.)
Maybe that’s why you have told us time and again that you love reading
about the latest engine technologies, which is why we devote a large part
of each January issue to the topic. As you'll
see in this issue, there are lots of exciting engine developments this
year. It’s enough to make a diehard gearhead want to repower his
boat or at least dream about the next one powered by the latest iron.
That’;s part of the fun of powerboating, but there have to be some
practical aspects. When it comes to engines, one major aspect is service.
It’s sad but true that even the most sophisticated engines eventually
stop running when they shouldn’t, and when that happens, what separates
the good from the bad and the ugly is how quickly the sick are healed.
That’s why choosing engines without considering service is like
fishing for mako in waders. Two
things are worth considering. First, when the wheels stop turning, it’s
not the engine manufacturer but the local service guy who ultimately determines
how long your boat will be tied to the dock. We learned this last summer
when we had a problem with the engines in our Fairline company boat and
had to turn to New England Detroit Diesel. When you find yourself in the
hands of a really good service facility like this, you realize that what
makes them so good is not just what they do, but how they do it. New England
responded promptly to our request for help, stayed in contact with us
all through the repair process, and even followed up after the work was
complete to make sure we were satisfied. The
other consideration is the principal constraint under which any service
center operates: parts availability. Here’s where the engine manufacturer
is important. Parts availability is the joint responsibility of the service
outlet and the manufacturer. If the part’s not there, it doesn’t
make any difference how good or fast the mechanics are. In our situation,
the wait for the part accounted for most of our down time. Once it arrived,
it was mere hours before we were on our way. When it comes to engines, we all tend to focus on performance, and understandably so. But when your engine doesn’t run, the only kind of performance that really matters is how quickly the local service guy and the engine manufacturer can get it going again.
|
||||||||||
This article originally appeared in the January 2003 issue of Power & Motoryacht magazine.













Brokerage Listings Powered by BoatQuest.com












